Parents, Teachers, And Students Gather To Protest Assembly Bill 84
- TVNext Admin
- 5일 전
- 9분 분량
Gathered to Oppose AB84, a proposition that could cut 30% of Charter School funding for non-classroom based education & MANY MORE reasons to oppose. 6.5.2025

(Picture: Protestors gather on Tourney Road in Valencia Friday morning to protest the AB 84 bill, otherwise known as "School Accountability: Office of the Education Inspector General," on May 30, 2025. Habeba Mostafa/ The Signal) Assembly Bill 84 :

(Note: 한글은 따로 올릴겠씁니다. )
Assembly Bill 84 was introduced by Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, who represents Torrance and surrounding areas in Southern Los Angeles and Robert Garcia who represents Long Beach area.
The reason given in the bill for its proposal is supposedly in response to the discovery of fraud perpetrated by non-classroom-based charter schools. The example cited in the bill’s fact sheet is a case where 11 defendants were found guilty of a fraud scheme involving nineteen charter schools and totaling $400 million dollars.
Assembly Bill 84 was introduced as, quote, “comprehensive reform to combat fraud” in the charter school system by “improving transparency and accountability among charter school authorizers and charter schools.”
What is interesting though, is that this bill does a lot of things, but most of them are not related to combatting fraud as it says.
The first change, and just about the only one related to fraud, is that AB 84 mandates comprehensive audits, including fraud detection, be performed for non-classroom-based charter schools. This makes sense because every system needs for internal controls and oversight and accountability within an organization to catch and prevent fraud. But that is where the fraud prevention piece pretty much stops, and the rest of the bill doesn’t seem to be related to fraud prevention in any tangible way.
Next, the bill imposes an oversight fee of 3%, meaning that the district public school governing body – the same governing authority that approves charters in the first place like we just discussed – can withhold 3% of the charter’s revenue for the costs of performing oversight functions like these audits.
The fee is currently 1%, so AB 84 raises it to 3%. The reason for raising it seems to be related to the new audit requirements that must be performed, but charter schools argue that district oversight staff often do very little oversight while still collecting the full fee. They also argue that the people who get paid the 3% are usually located far from the charter school, making oversight minimal or largely symbolic.
The bill goes on to require that public school governing boards must approve all contractor agreements – which means that any contract a charter school enters into with an outside organization—whether for curriculum, staffing, facilities, tech, or services—must be reviewed and formally approved by the school's authorizing board. Charter schools often contract with outside companies for curriculum or online learning platforms, special education services, building leases or facility improvements, management support or back-office operations, technology and software tools, and more.
Under AB 84, these contracts need to be submitted for approval by the authorizing district board. That means charter schools can’t simply sign agreements on their own without outside review. This requirement gives school districts more control over how charter schools operate, especially when it comes to financial and vendor decisions.
But it goes even further, and outright prohibits private religious organizations or schools from serving as public school contractors, meaning that charter schools and traditional public schools would no longer be allowed to hire or partner with any organization that is religiously affiliated — even if the service itself is secular.
This is a stipulation that has no connection whatsoever to fraud or abuse. Under this kind of rule, a charter school could not contract with any group that is a religiously affiliated private school, a faith-based nonprofit or ministry, or a church-run vendor – even if that vendor is providing something neutral like tutoring, counseling, or online learning. Tangible examples of this would be a charter school contracting with a Christian counseling center to provide family mental health services, a homeschool charter reimbursing a family for taking a class at a private religious school, partnering with a faith-based music program even if the curriculum is secular, or hiring a religiously affiliated online platform for foreign language, Bible as literature, or philosophy classes. (Read more from here: https://www.thecaliforniaconversation.com/articles/assembly-bill-84)
MORE REASONS TO OPPOSE AB84 : see resources and news below.
By Facts, Law, Truth & Justice (FLTJ)
Usher in AB84: “Comprehensive Charter School Reform”
Approximately 100 pages in length, this “comprehensive reform” will do numerous things to California charter schools and the small businesses that support them to impede their already bare-bones operations in order to exterminate them, forcing all students to turn to California’s dismal public school options. Here are just a few:
1. Narrow and Increase Requirements for Charter School Authorizations
Broaden bases for school districts to deny charter petition.
Will allow districts to deny a petition if approving them would “jeopardize the district's fiscal health,” which is not defined (of course).
2. Restrict “Independent Study” Options
“Independent study” programs allow students to learn outside a traditional classroom, often remotely, and are common for homeschooling, alternative education, or during emergencies like pandemics.
AB84 will limit funding depending on classroom attendance (see No. 5).
Impose more and rigorous rules around how independent study programs operate, including documentation, instructional minutes, attendance verification.
3. Increase Cost, Scope, and Frequency of Financial and Performance Audits.
More frequent audits.
More data on pupils: enrollment, residency, ratios, funding allocations, identify relationships with related entities with proper disclosure and consolidation in financial statement, corrective actions or plans, etc.
More expensive (raised pricing from 1% to 3%, paid for by charter schools).
Must be handed over to the California Department of Education to publish to “promote transparency and inform policy decisions.”
They want your children in The System.
4. Standardized Reporting Templates
Force superintendents to use the State’s standardized (digital) templates when reporting on teacher misassignments, vacancies, and other staffing issues.
5. More Rigorous Funding Requirements
Introduce a tiered funding model (70%, 85%, or 100%) based on criteria like spending on teachers, instructional services, and student demographics.
Reduce funding to charter schools with less than 75% in-person instructional time up to 30%, or approximately $4,500/child.
“Instructional time” refers to the time students spend directly receiving instruction from a teacher in a school setting.
A typical school week has 30 hours of scheduled instructional time. 75% of that is 22.5 hours. Therefore, charters that do not force their children to sit in a classroom for 22.5 or more hours per weeks, will risk losing even more funds.
Many children in charter schools physically cannot attend school for that many hours, whether for medical (e.g. exceptional needs, trauma, mental health issues) or logistical reasons (commute, working parents) and cannot meet this requirement even if they wanted to.
6. Restrict Contract Terms and Negotiations
Prohibit religious contractors or vendors from servicing charter schools.
Prohibit free-market negotiations and service providing. Fees must be flat and not based on revenue.
Stricter regulations on vendor contracts and educational enrichment activities.
7. Mandatory Credentialing for Teachers and Staff
Requires teachers, service providers, and administrators to hold valid state credentials or permits.
While this may seem like a good idea, many charter school families are running from bad experiences with public school teachers. We do not want teachers who have been indoctrinated by the CTA to be teaching our kids.
Instead, many charter schools employ experts in various subject matters, like music, art, engineering, design. So, for example, your children could be taught space travel by an uncredentialed former NASA astronaut, or music by a philharmonic conductor. Under AB84 that would not be allowed.
8. Increase Student-to-Teacher Ratios.
Increase the average daily attendance-to-certificated-employee ratios.
Increasing the student-to-teacher ratio for funding purposes will lead to higher class sizes and workload per teacher, and decreased effectiveness where charter schools are already excelling in this arena.
9. Overburden and Shut Down Charter Schools.
See 1-8, above.
10. Overburden and Shut Down the Small Businesses that Support Charter Schools.
See 1-9, above.
Note: this affects EVERY child in the State of California. Charter school children are not the only children who use:
College Preparatory Programs
These programs focus on academic rigor and preparing students for 4-year universities.
Examples:
Advanced Placement (AP) courses
Dual enrollment with community colleges
AVID (Advancement Via Individual Determination)
STEM/STEAM-Focused Programs
Charter schools often specialize in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics to meet workforce demands.
Examples:
Project Lead the Way (PLTW)
Robotics and coding curriculum (e.g., VEX, Arduino)
Integrated science and math project-based learning (PBL)
Arts Integration or Performing Arts Programs
Some charter schools emphasize the fine and performing arts alongside academics.
Focus Areas:
Visual arts, theater, music, and dance
Arts-integrated curriculum (academic subjects taught through arts)
Montessori or Waldorf-Inspired Programs
Used especially at the elementary level to support child-led and holistic learning.
Features:
Mixed-age classrooms
Emphasis on hands-on, experiential learning
Social-emotional development
Language Immersion or International Baccalaureate (IB)
Charter schools may offer world language immersion or globally recognized curricula.
Types:
Spanish, Mandarin, or French immersion
IB Primary, Middle, or Diploma Programmers
Classical Education Programs
These emphasize traditional liberal arts, including grammar, logic, and rhetoric.
Examples:
Great Books curriculum
Socratic dialogue
Latin language instruction
I
Independent Study / Personalized Learning Programs
Designed for homeschool families or students needing flexible schedules.
Used by:
Online or hybrid charter schools
Non-classroom-based programs like those managed by Inspire, Compass, or Summit Learning
Components:
Online platforms (Edgenuity, APEX, Canvas)
Regular check-ins with credentialed teachers
Career and Technical Education (CTE)
Charters offering hands-on career pathways in high-demand fields.
Pathways May Include:
Healthcare (CNA, medical assistant)
Information Technology
Automotive or construction trades
Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) and Trauma-Informed Models
Especially in urban charter schools focused on underserved populations.
Incorporates:
Restorative justice practices
Daily advisory periods
SEL curriculum like Second Step or CASEL-aligned programs
Military or Discipline-Focused Programs
A few charter schools adopt a military-style or high-discipline approach.
Features:
Uniforms
Leadership training
Physical fitness requirements
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW RIGHT NOW and TAKE ACTION :
“AB 84 doesn’t fix a loophole, it doubles down on a funding system that already underfunds independent study students. It punishes schools that are fully compliant and high-performing just because students don’t sit in a classroom every day. And it targets a model of education that prioritizes parent involvement, the very thing our state has always said it supports.”— Windi Elklund,
ACTION TO TAKE: CALL, EMAIL(One click campaign) AND SHARE !

One Click Action Campaign: https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=23664
Call your Assembly member to register your opposition and tell them to vote “NO” or at the very least abstain if AB84 comes to floor vote.
Call these “moveable middle” Assemblymembers:
David Alvarez 916 319 2080
Jasmeet Baines 916 319 2035
Mike Gipson 916 319 2065
Jacqui Irwin 916 319 2042
Maggy Krell 916 319 2006
Sharon Quirk-Silva 916 319 2067
James Ramos 916 319 2045
Rhodesia Ransom 916 319 2013
Pilar Schiavo 916 319 2040
Esmerelda Soria 916 319 2027
Avelino Valencia 916 319 2068
Chris Ward 916 319 2078
Call your Chamber of Commerce. Share this article. Explain how this will run numerous small business out of business. Ask them to submit a formal opposition to AB84.
Call your Senator to register your opposition and tell them to vote “NO” or at the very least abstain if AB84 comes to floor vote.
No it is not too early to do so. If we put enough pressure before the Assembly vote, the Senate can call the Assembly and tell them to kill the bill and not let it go to the Senate.
Call Gavin to register your opposition and tell them to veto AB84 if it passes out of the Legislature.
No it is not too early to do so. If we put enough pressure on Gavin, he could try and kill it before it gets to his desk to avoid the controversy.
BONUS ROUNDS: One-Click Campaigns:
https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=23664
https://www.change.org/p/stopthemandate-help-stop-the-unconstitutional-mandate-being-forced-on-healthcare-workers-teachers-law-enforcement-firefighters-county-city-and-state-community-members-and-private-industry-workers/u/33523020
https://www.veeto.app/email/template/send/oppose-ab-84-protect-charter-8cen
SHARE THIS SUBSTACK
RESOURCES & NEWS ON AB84:
****Legislation Take Action*** key AB84 resource:
AB84 Text, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB84
Find Your California Representatives:
California Assembly Members: https://www.assembly.ca.gov/assemblymembers
AB 84 in the news
California Globe • Jun 06, 2025
Anti-Charter Bill Threatens Educational Freedom - California Globe
KHTS Radio • Jun 06, 2025
Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo Responds To Progress On AB 84 - KHTS Radio
Ventura County Star • May 03, 2025·
San Diego Union-Tribune • May 05, 2025
San Diego Union-Tribune Lawmakers are trying once more to pass sweeping changes to charter school oversight. Here’s what they want. -
Assembly Bill 84 is a direct threat to students with disabilities - Orange County Register Orange County Register • May 22, 2025
Action Alert: Charter Schools Under Attack - CAalifornia Policy Center
California Policy Center • May 22, 2025
Bill seeks to oversee charter schools, but education centers say it’s detrimental - fox5sandiego.com fox5sandiego.com • May 28, 2025
Parents, students protest proposed bill to cut charter school funding - Santa Clarita Valley Signal Santa Clarita Valley Signal • May 31, 2025
·Legislature at Full Throttle: CFC Stands in the Gap as Capitol Pushes an Anti-Family Agenda - California Family Council California Family Council • Apr 28, 2025
Leslie Shebley: A step backwards, AB 84 undermines charter schools - The Vacaville Reporter The Vacaville Reporter • May 30, 2025
The hypocrisy behind California’s proposed charter school funding cuts | Opinion - Modesto Bee Modesto Bee • May 28, 2025